Note that I did not say that you don't know, because that's technically a given for all people.  Having faith requires that you not know.  I suppose that means that only agnostics do not have a god-concept related faith.

  The thing with me, however, is something different.  I do believe that "god" exists, but I fully acknowledge that I do not know the nature of that "god".

  Here is something that is important to know about any person's concept of "god": it's all just their interpretation.  The odds of any two people in the world having the exact same concept of "god" is astronomical.  Even if you're in the same religion, there will be differences.

  Keeping that in mind, think about people who are actually angry at "god" or those who chose to be atheist out of anger.  However you feel about "god", you're actually feeling that about your own personal interpretation.

  What is the nature of "god"?  I'm going to use the Christian god as an example, because that's the one about which I am the most knowledgeable.

  I'm going to step outside of objectivity, just for a moment, and call it absurd to believe that the Bible can be taken entirely literally.  Most people believe it is a mixture of facts and metaphor.  It's the exact ratio that is the bigger debate.

  The Bible uses metaphor, which means you cannot take all of it at face value, which means you're giving it a significant portion of its meaning.  That being said, why is it that people would humanize God and give God faults?

  Consider what God is supposed to be, fundamentally.  Omniscient (all-knowing) and omnipotent (all-powerful).  First of all, if you're all-knowing, then that automatically means that you're all-powerful and have total wisdom.  That being said, you would be without weakness.  You would be perfect.