|
Glenn Beck: March to Socialism - science vs. ideology
The interview is sort of just bonus info if you care to read it. Here's some of the important details that will go to my eventual point.
Bush did not ban embryonic stem-cell research out-right. What he did made it so that no new ebryos would be created for the research, and that no tax payer money would be used to fund it. He left it to the private sector.
This encouraged scientists to find other avenues for stem-cell of research. The outcome was amazing advances and achievements in the field that did not involve killing innocent humans.
You want the short version? Non ebryonic stem-cell research has far surpassed even the expectations of ebryonic stem-cell research.
But this does not make Liberals happy. They keep insisting that the research be embryonic. (Yes, I am speaking very generally of Liberals.)
Now, I am more than willing to give a lot of Liberals the benifit of the doubt that they are just ignorant of the advancements, since those amazing achievments would never be espoused by their fellows Liberals. But let's carry on with those who did know, in a moment.
Have you ever noticed how Liberals promote abortion more than adoption? Putting 2 and 2 together, I am incredibly curious about this seeming hatred for unborn human beings.
Maybe it's not hatred. If not, then what is it? Fear? Why do they want to kill the unborn and, in some cases, with pride? Does human life mean so little to them?
If you're a Liberal, then can you please explain this to me? And don't give me right to choose crap. It's an innocent, human, life.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Beck: Spotlight on Science - Dr. Carter
Just a little something for the "Global Warming" idiots.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, Barrakarl Obamarx, the Celebrity in Chief, one again improves our reputaion with the rest of the world by massively insulting England.
Obama's British 'Gift Gaffe' Not Reported By U.S. Media
You know, when he wants to enact some horrible policy, I expect it from him.
When gives a crappy gift to a leader of another country, I don't see that coming, and I'm disappointed in him.
When he RETURNS a previously given gift, ... that marked possibly the worst day in American history, ... and that symbolized that country standing by us.... Even I did not think he could do something so deplorable.
I seriously did not think I would ever think less of him, and then he does that. This goes beyond politics.
And he says England is no different from any other of the U.N. countries. So, does this mean he will treat all their leaders like game show losers, giving them a consolation prize that they won't give a crap about and/or won't be able to use?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard "Come Together" by The Beatles a few times on the radio recently. A single line stands out to me:
"One thing I can tell you is you got to be free"
I think that line needs to be updated for the modern Liberal.
"One thing I can tell you is you got to be government controlled."
After all, you must conform. You must obey. Government knows best. You're weak and stupid. You can't take care of yourself. If not for the government, why, you'd just simply die.
And naturally, the answer is to become like the nations that so many LEGAL (and illegal) immigrants came here to get away from. Politicians are geniuses, and they have only your best interest at heart.
*vomitvomitvomitvomitvomitvomitvomitvomitvomit*
|
